← All launches
Praxikon logo
0 Report

Praxikon

by FastDrop

MCP Verified 1 hour ago Registry import free

EU AI Act and GDPR checks with sources: classify an AI system, trace each duty, find the supervisor.

EU AI Act and GDPR checks with sources: classify an AI system, trace each duty, find the supervisor. Official MCP Registry: com.praxikon/praxikon@2.3.0. Remote endpoint: https://www.praxikon.com/api/mcp

Problem it solves

Discoverable MCP server listed in the official MCP Registry.

How it's different

Remote MCP endpoint ingested from the official registry and probed by FastDrop.

Ingested from the official MCP Registry

FastDrop pulled this entry from the official MCP Registry as com.praxikon/praxikon and probed the endpoint. The maker did not submit it, so the outbound link is not endorsed and the description is not theirs.

If this is your server, claim the listing to edit it and take ownership. The registry index lists everything else still awaiting a probe.

Claim this listing

Tools this endpoint exposes

Read directly from the endpoint on 11 Oct 2026. Not supplied by the maker.

  • classify_system

    Use this as the first step when you hold a concrete AI system and need to know which routes of the EU AI Act come into view: prohibited practice screening, Annex III high risk, transparency, FRIA and

  • get_applicable_obligations

    Use this when you need the obligations themselves for one assessed system rather than the classification picture: which obligations apply, which possibly apply, from when, why, and on which source and

  • explain_applicability

    Use this whenever you have to justify why an obligation does or does not bear on a case, and an outcome on its own is not enough. It returns the legal path: the conditions under which the rule is abou

  • get_source_provenance

    Use this before you quote, cite or hand on anything from this graph, and whenever a reader asks on what authority a statement rests. It returns, for one object, every statement with its kind, its prim

  • get_national_enforcement

    Use this for the national layer: which authority is designated in a member state, how far the implementing law has come, and which dated enforcement signals are recorded, each with a primary source. T

  • check_case

    Use this when the user describes a concrete, intended use of AI or of personal data (a system, a project, a supplier) and wants to know whether a DPIA, a FRIA or duties under the GDPR (AVG) and the EU

  • export_dpia_intake

    Use this when the user wants the DPIA intake of a concrete, intended use of AI or of personal data as a Word file to work on, and, where the FRIA comes into play, the FRIA draft as a second file. It t

  • answer_question

    Use this for a short, general question about the EU AI Act or the GDPR (AVG), such as whether a customer service chatbot has to say that it is AI or when a DPIA is required. It looks the question up i

Is this tool yours?

Claim this listing and we’ll verify ownership before handing it over.

Sign in to claim this listing

Matched on shared tags and the tools their MCP servers actually expose.

Reviews

Sign in to leave a review.

No reviews yet.

Comments

Sign in to join the discussion.

No comments yet - start the discussion.